PENDAKWARAYA Muhammad Fariz Afiq bin Mohd Rohizi

PENDAKWARAYA Muhammad Fariz Afiq bin Mohd Rohizi

The appellate court upheld the conviction because the child complainant was competent and credible, his testimony was corroborated by immediate disclosure to his mother, the police report, positive identification at an ID parade and in court, and medical evidence of fresh perianal tears consistent with finger insertion; these combined proved the elements of Section 377CA beyond reasonable doubt. Absence of forensic sperm or fingernail evidence did not undermine the case. The sentence of eight years imprisonment and four strokes, together with rehabilitative counselling, was within lawful discretion and did not warrant appellate interference.

Citation
AB - 42S - 8 - 02/2020 & AB - 42JSKH - 2 - 02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Appellant/accused: Muhammad Fariz Afiq bin Mohd Rohizi; Public Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
4 September 2020
Case Number
AB - 42S - 8 - 02/2020 & AB - 42JSKH - 2 - 02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to High Court Against Conviction and Sentence (judgment)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Legal Topics
Sexual Connection Under Section 377 CA Penal Code, Competency of Child Witness (s.133 a Evidence Act), Corroboration and Prior Consistent Statements (s.157 Evidence Act), Identification Evidence and ID Parade, Forensic Evidence and Medical Examination, Sentencing Principles and Rehabilitation
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Child Protection Evidence Law Sentencing Law Sexual Connection Under Section 377 CA Penal Code Competency of Child Witness (s.133 a Evidence Act) Corroboration and Prior Consistent Statements (s.157 Evidence Act) +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muhammad Fariz Afiq bin Mohd Rohizi

Appellant/accused

Public Prosecutor

Public Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal to High Court Against Conviction and Sentence (judgment)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 competency and credibility of a child witness
  2. 2 reliability of identification (ID parade and dock identification)
  3. 3 sufficiency of forensic and medical evidence to prove sexual assault

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court upheld the conviction because the child complainant was competent and credible, his testimony was corroborated by immediate disclosure to his mother, the police report, positive identification at an ID parade and in court, and medical evidence of fresh perianal tears consistent with finger insertion; these combined proved the elements of Section 377CA beyond reasonable doubt. Absence of forensic sperm or fingernail evidence did not undermine the case. The sentence of eight years imprisonment and four strokes, together with rehabilitative counselling, was within lawful discretion and did not warrant appellate interference.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal by accused dismissed
  • Conviction affirmed