1. KHOO TENG CHUAN 2. KHOR CHUN MOOI 1. WEALTHY ACHIEVERS SDN BHD (NO SYARIKAT: 811438-A) 2. ANG KIM CHENG @ ANG TENG KOK 3. KANG CHAI 4. CHAN WAI KIT
On the totality of circumstantial and documentary evidence the Court concluded WA was operated for the benefit of the five families, the 2nd defendant was the shadow director and directing mind of WA, and the transfer of the 1st plaintiff's one share to the 3rd defendant was invalid and set aside; the separate application to re-amend pleadings was correctly refused as too late and prejudicial.
- Citation
- P-02(NCVC)(W)-2180-10/2018 DIDENGAR BERSAMA P-02(NCVC)(W)-2286-11/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Khoo Teng Chuan; Appellant/plaintiff: Khor Chun Mooi; Respondent/defendant: Wealthy Achievers Sdn Bhd (811438-A); Respondent/defendant: Ang Kim Cheng @ Ang Teng Kok; Respondent/defendant: Kang Chai; Respondent/defendant: Chan Wai Kit
- Court
- NCVC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2020
- Case Number
- P-02(NCVC)(W)-2180-10/2018 DIDENGAR BERSAMA P-02(NCVC)(W)-2286-11/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) From High Court / Judgment on Appeal (determination)
- Outcome
- Civil Appeal No. P-02(NCVC)(W)-2286-11/2018 allowed in part; Civil Appeal No. P-02(NCVC)(W)-2180-10/2018 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Shadow Director, Nominee Director, Share Transfer Validity, Breach of Directors' Duties, Late Amendment of Pleadings, Corporate Governance
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khoo Teng Chuan
Appellant/plaintiff
Khor Chun Mooi
Appellant/plaintiff
Wealthy Achievers Sdn Bhd (811438-A)
Respondent/defendant
Ang Kim Cheng @ Ang Teng Kok
Respondent/defendant
Kang Chai
Respondent/defendant
Chan Wai Kit
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) From High Court / Judgment on Appeal (determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wealthy Achievers Sdn Bhd (WA) belonged to the five families
- 2 Whether Ang Kim Cheng (2nd defendant) was a shadow director of WA
- 3 Whether the transfer of the 1st plaintiff's one share to the 3rd defendant was invalid
Ratio Decidendi
On the totality of circumstantial and documentary evidence the Court concluded WA was operated for the benefit of the five families, the 2nd defendant was the shadow director and directing mind of WA, and the transfer of the 1st plaintiff's one share to the 3rd defendant was invalid and set aside; the separate application to re-amend pleadings was correctly refused as too late and prejudicial.
Court Disposition
Civil Appeal No. P-02(NCVC)(W)-2286-11/2018 allowed in part; Civil Appeal No. P-02(NCVC)(W)-2180-10/2018 dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the transfer of the one share in WA from the 1st plaintiff to the 3rd defendant is invalid and of no effect and is hereby set aside
- The 2nd and 4th defendants shall indemnify the 2nd plaintiff for any liability incurred by the 2nd plaintiff as director of WA for failure to prepare and file WA's relevant annual reports and audited accounts with relevant authorities
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment