1. ) Shahrizal bin Shukor 2. ) 1. ) 2. ) Shahrizal bin Shukor
Conviction overturned because prosecution failed to prove all statutory ingredients of section 472: specifically there was insufficient evidence of the appellant's intention that the counterfeit stamps be used to commit a forgery and the medical certificates did not amount to "valuable securities" under section 30, therefore s.467 was not engaged and s.472 was not made out.
- Citation
- JA-42S-2-02/2019 & JA-42H-4-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant: Shahrizal bin Shukor; Respondent: Public Prosecutor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2020
- Case Number
- JA-42S-2-02/2019 & JA-42H-4-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence (high Court Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted and discharged; prosecution's cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Section 472 Penal Code, Valuable Security (section 30), Ingredients of Offence, Possession and Knowledge, Intention to Commit Forgery
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shahrizal bin Shukor
Appellant
Public Prosecutor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence (high Court Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had possession of and knowledge that the rubber stamps were counterfeit
- 2 Whether the rubber stamps were made to produce impressions
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved the appellant's intention that the stamps be used to commit forgery
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction overturned because prosecution failed to prove all statutory ingredients of section 472: specifically there was insufficient evidence of the appellant's intention that the counterfeit stamps be used to commit a forgery and the medical certificates did not amount to "valuable securities" under section 30, therefore s.467 was not engaged and s.472 was not made out.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted and discharged; prosecution's cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Set aside conviction and sentence of the Sessions Court
- Acquittal and discharge of the appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment