JAYA PLUS RESOURCES SDN. BHD. (NO. SYARIKAT : 624486-v) 1. ) SHANE MURPHY SCHOON (NO. PASPORT : E4842603B) 2. ) ES UNDERWATER SOLUTION SDN. BHD. (NO. SYARIKAT : 1210885-T) 3. ) MOHAMMAD FAIZAL BIN IBRAHIM (NO. KP : 780517-14-5617) 4. ) MOHA
The court held that the plaintiff's pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action and the allegations of fraud/misrepresentation and the director role of Defendant No.4 raise factual disputes that are not plainly unsustainable; therefore the Order 18 strike-out application must be dismissed and the matter proceed to full trial.
- Citation
- WA-22NCVC-931-12/2019 (KANDUNGAN 18) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Mohammad Aidil bin Mohammad Noh (No. Passport: E4633487D); Plaintiff/respondent: Jaya Plus Resources Sdn. Bhd. (No. Syarikat: 624486-V); Defendant: Shane Murphy Schoon (No. Passport: E4842603B); Defendant: ES Underwatersolution Sdn. Bhd. (No. Syarikat: 1210885-T); Defendant: Mohammad Faizal bin Ibrahim (No. K/P: 780517-14-5617); Defendant: Azahari bin Hassan Basri (No. K/P: 780211-08-6781)
- Court
- KANDUNGAN 18
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2020
- Case Number
- WA-22NCVC-931-12/2019 (KANDUNGAN 18) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application Under Order 18 to Strike Out Writ Dismissed at Interlocutory Stage
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Striking Out Under Order 18, Director Liability, Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammad Aidil bin Mohammad Noh (No. Passport: E4633487D)
Defendant/appellant
Jaya Plus Resources Sdn. Bhd. (No. Syarikat: 624486-V)
Plaintiff/respondent
Shane Murphy Schoon (No. Passport: E4842603B)
Defendant
ES Underwatersolution Sdn. Bhd. (No. Syarikat: 1210885-T)
Defendant
Mohammad Faizal bin Ibrahim (No. K/P: 780517-14-5617)
Defendant
Azahari bin Hassan Basri (No. K/P: 780211-08-6781)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application Under Order 18 to Strike Out Writ Dismissed at Interlocutory Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff disclosed a cause of action against Defendant No.4
- 2 Whether lack of contractual privity defeats the plaintiff's claim against Defendant No.4
- 3 Whether the pleadings are plain and obviously unsustainable for summary striking out under Order 18
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the plaintiff's pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action and the allegations of fraud/misrepresentation and the director role of Defendant No.4 raise factual disputes that are not plainly unsustainable; therefore the Order 18 strike-out application must be dismissed and the matter proceed to full trial.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application under Order 18 (Kandungan 18) dismissed with costs in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment