LIM JIT KIM @ LIM TIAN JEE TAN YIAN PING GOH SIEW KOON @ ENG SING KUAN TEY LIONG SENG
Enc.380 (liquidator's cash distribution proposal) is dismissed because it fails to resolve cross‑shareholdings, perpetuates circular distributions and escalating costs, and the withdrawn NCD meant the cash proposal was inadequately particularized; Enc.1 (distribution in specie of Sing Lian shares held by Sin Hai) is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-28PW-499-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellants: Lim Jit Kim @ Lim Tian Jee & 18 others; Respondent: Sing Lian Sdn Bhd; 4th Respondent: Sin Hai Berhad (in liquidation)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2020
- Case Number
- WA-28PW-499-11/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up / Company Liquidation (compulsory) / Judgment on Cross Applications for Directions and Distributions; Appeals From Directions Order
- Outcome
- Application Enc.380 dismissed; Application Enc.1 allowed
- Legal Topics
- Cross Shareholding, Distribution in Specie, Net Cash Distribution, Res Judicata, Real Property Gains Tax (rpgt), Liquidator's Discretion, Winding Up Procedure, Sections 67, 233/236/237/289/296/310 CA 1965 and Corresponding CA 2016 Provisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim Jit Kim @ Lim Tian Jee & 18 others
Appellants
Sing Lian Sdn Bhd
Respondent
Sin Hai Berhad (in liquidation)
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up / Company Liquidation (compulsory) / Judgment on Cross Applications for Directions and Distributions; Appeals From Directions Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Enc.1 (distribution in specie of Sing Lian shares held by Sin Hai) is barred by res judicata
- 2 Whether liquidator's cash distribution / Net Cash Distribution (Enc.380) is appropriate to resolve cross-shareholdings
- 3 Whether distribution in specie would constitute prohibited financial assistance under s67 CA 1965
Ratio Decidendi
Enc.380 (liquidator's cash distribution proposal) is dismissed because it fails to resolve cross‑shareholdings, perpetuates circular distributions and escalating costs, and the withdrawn NCD meant the cash proposal was inadequately particularized; Enc.1 (distribution in specie of Sing Lian shares held by Sin Hai) is allowed because res judicata did not apply to the later complete proposal, a distribution in specie in a solvent winding up is permissible and does not constitute prohibited financial assistance under s67(1) nor necessarily contravene s223/233 provided appropriate court sanction is obtained from the relevant winding‑up court(s), and the liquidator must have regard to the...
Court Disposition
Application Enc.380 dismissed; Application Enc.1 allowed
Orders
- Enc.380 dismissed with costs
- Enc.1 allowed; directions given to implement distribution in specie of Sing Lian shares held by Sin Hai subject to necessary sanction from the Sing Lian winding up Court (Seremban) and compliance with steps set out in judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment