SISTEM LINGKARAN LEBUHRAYA KAJANG SDN BHD 1. ) ORCHARD CIRLCE SDN BHD 2. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
The Federal Court held the High Court correctly found the proprietor had effectively surrendered the specified area (application and approval under NLC occurred and endorsement delay was due to proprietor not producing title), that the question presented was essentially factual and concerned compensation (non-appealable under the proviso to s.49 LAA), and that the Court of Appeal erred in remitting the matter for reassessment; accordingly the Court of Appeal decision was set aside and the High Court judgment affirmed.
- Citation
- 01(f)-3-02/2024(B) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sistem Lingkaran Lebuhraya Kajang Sdn. Bhd.; 1st Respondent: Orchard Circle Sdn. Bhd.; 2nd Respondent: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
- Court
- f
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2025
- Case Number
- 01(f)-3-02/2024(B) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (federal Court) / Final Determination on Appeal From Court of Appeal Against High Court Land Reference Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of the Court of Appeal set aside; decision of the High Court affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Surrender of Title Under National Land Code, Compulsory Acquisition and Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act 1960, Appealability of Compensation Awards, Estoppel and Res Judicata, Question of Law Vs Fact
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sistem Lingkaran Lebuhraya Kajang Sdn. Bhd.
Appellant
Orchard Circle Sdn. Bhd.
1st Respondent
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Hulu Langat
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (federal Court) / Final Determination on Appeal From Court of Appeal Against High Court Land Reference Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 17,284.67 sqm area was validly surrendered under the National Land Code and effect of non-endorsement on title
- 2 Whether validity of surrender is question of law or fact and whether that permits an appeal under proviso to s.49 LAA
- 3 Whether nominal compensation was appropriate given surrender and related contractual/development conditions
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court held the High Court correctly found the proprietor had effectively surrendered the specified area (application and approval under NLC occurred and endorsement delay was due to proprietor not producing title), that the question presented was essentially factual and concerned compensation (non-appealable under the proviso to s.49 LAA), and that the Court of Appeal erred in remitting the matter for reassessment; accordingly the Court of Appeal decision was set aside and the High Court judgment affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of the Court of Appeal set aside; decision of the High Court affirmed
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Court of Appeal decision set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment