SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD (Dahulunya dikenali BANK PERUSAHAAN KECIL & SEDERHANA MALAYSIA BERHAD) 1. ) SD WORK SDN BHD 2. ) MD NAZIRUDDIN BIN MOHAMAD
Plaintiff satisfied the Order 14 prerequisites and proved indebtedness by producing a certificate/statement of indebtedness which is conclusive absent manifest error; defendants failed to demonstrate any manifest error or particularised meritorious defence or triable issue (their defences were bare denials and legal assertions concerning Shariah compliance and authority were unsupported); accordingly summary judgment under Order 14 was granted for the plaintiff and costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Citation
- TA-A52M-166-11/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD; Defendant: SD WORK SDN BHD; Defendant: MD NAZIRUDDIN BIN MOHAMAD DAHLAN
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2026
- Case Number
- TA-A52M-166-11/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Debt Recovery – Summary Judgment (order 14) / Post‑judgment/appeal Against Interlocutory Decision (order 14 Application)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of Plaintiff against Defendants under Order 14 Rules of Court 2012
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Certificate of Indebtedness, Murabahah Financing, Shariah Compliance, Service of Notices, Manifest Error, Res Judicata, Notice and Termination
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD
Plaintiff
SD WORK SDN BHD
Defendant
MD NAZIRUDDIN BIN MOHAMAD DAHLAN
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Debt Recovery – Summary Judgment (order 14) / Post‑judgment/appeal Against Interlocutory Decision (order 14 Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff satisfied prerequisites for summary judgment under Order 14
- 2 Whether the certificate/statement of indebtedness is conclusive absent manifest error
- 3 Whether defendants raised triable issues or meritorious defences
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff satisfied the Order 14 prerequisites and proved indebtedness by producing a certificate/statement of indebtedness which is conclusive absent manifest error; defendants failed to demonstrate any manifest error or particularised meritorious defence or triable issue (their defences were bare denials and legal assertions concerning Shariah compliance and authority were unsupported); accordingly summary judgment under Order 14 was granted for the plaintiff and costs awarded to plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of Plaintiff against Defendants under Order 14 Rules of Court 2012
Orders
- Summary judgment allowed for the Plaintiff against the Defendants under Order 14 of the Rules of Court 2012
- Judgment for RM221,753.07 (sum claimed by Plaintiff as at 20.10.2023) as evidenced by the Certificate of Indebtedness
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment