SMART TECH INNOVATIVE SDN BHD PENCELAH ANCALA MEGAH SDN. BHD.

SMART TECH INNOVATIVE SDN BHD PENCELAH ANCALA MEGAH SDN. BHD.

The proposed intervener's application was dismissed because it failed to establish locus standi or any proprietary interest in the goods, produced no evidence displacing the applicant's ownership proof, was not the lawful occupier of the premises (Urbax was the occupier), and pursued an unrelated civil claim in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
DI-A54-3-03/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Applicant: SMART TECH INNOVATIVE SDN BHD; Proposed Intervener: ANCALA MEGAH SDN. BHD.
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
18 September 2025
Case Number
DI-A54-3-03/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Civil Interlocutory Application (guaman Sivil) / Interlocutory Application Determined in Sessions Court; Appeal Filed to High Court
Outcome
Application by proposed intervener dismissed with costs; appeal pending to High Court.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction, Locus Standi, Possession and Ownership of Goods, Costs, Jurisdiction/venue
Civil Procedure Property Law Injunctions Intervention/joinder Interlocutory Mandatory Injunction Locus Standi Possession and Ownership of Goods Costs +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SMART TECH INNOVATIVE SDN BHD

Applicant

ANCALA MEGAH SDN. BHD.

Proposed Intervener

Procedural Posture

Civil Interlocutory Application (guaman Sivil) / Interlocutory Application Determined in Sessions Court; Appeal Filed to High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether proposed intervener has locus standi to intervene
  2. 2 Whether goods in dispute are owned by applicant or by proposed intervener/IsCorp
  3. 3 Whether intervention is appropriate forum and procedure given separate civil suit in Ipoh

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed intervener's application was dismissed because it failed to establish locus standi or any proprietary interest in the goods, produced no evidence displacing the applicant's ownership proof, was not the lawful occupier of the premises (Urbax was the occupier), and pursued an unrelated civil claim in another forum (Ipoh) instead of joining proper parties or suing in the correct venue; therefore leave to intervene and to set aside the ex parte injunction was refused and costs awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application by proposed intervener dismissed with costs; appeal pending to High Court.

Orders

  • Application by Ancala Megah Sdn. Bhd. to intervene and related interlocutory reliefs dismissed
  • Costs of RM 3,000 awarded to Applicant (global) payable to SMART TECH INNOVATIVE SDN BHD (@ RM 500 per related application)