SRI SELTRA SDN BHD 1. ) Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia 2. ) Pentadbir Tanah dan Daerah
Court held applicant (LLM) established a prima facie case; the Land Reference judge properly reduced the Award to RM166,365,058.05 by adopting and adjusting the JPPH 4th comparable to RM900 psm; s29A does not restrict the court from reducing the award by more than the 25% withheld and the court may order refund of any excess paid under s31; no procedural impropriety or breach of natural justice was established; appeal dismissed and cross-appeal allowed ordering refund of excess RM13,863,754.45 with interest and costs.
- Citation
- B-01(A)-121-02/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sri Seltra Sdn Bhd; 1st Respondent / Acquiring Authority / Cross Appellant: Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia; 2nd Respondent / Land Administrator: Pentadbir Tanah dan Daerah Hulu Langat
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2021
- Case Number
- B-01(A)-121-02/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Acquisition Appeal and Land Reference / Court of Appeal Determination of Appeal and Cross Appeal After High Court Land Reference Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Compensation, Withholding Under S29 a LAA, Assessors' Role in Land Reference, Natural Justice, Development Potential, Prima Facie Evidential Burden
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sri Seltra Sdn Bhd
Appellant
Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia
1st Respondent / Acquiring Authority / Cross Appellant
Pentadbir Tanah dan Daerah Hulu Langat
2nd Respondent / Land Administrator
Procedural Posture
Land Acquisition Appeal and Land Reference / Court of Appeal Determination of Appeal and Cross Appeal After High Court Land Reference Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant's (LLM) valuer's report must alone establish a prima facie case
- 2 Whether High Court may reduce award by more than 25% withheld under s29A LAA and order refund of excess
- 3 Whether refund of excess can be ordered against recipient under s31 LAA
Ratio Decidendi
Court held applicant (LLM) established a prima facie case; the Land Reference judge properly reduced the Award to RM166,365,058.05 by adopting and adjusting the JPPH 4th comparable to RM900 psm; s29A does not restrict the court from reducing the award by more than the 25% withheld and the court may order refund of any excess paid under s31; no procedural impropriety or breach of natural justice was established; appeal dismissed and cross-appeal allowed ordering refund of excess RM13,863,754.45 with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Cross-appeal allowed; Appellant (Sri Seltra Sdn Bhd) ordered to refund Excess Sum of RM13,863,754.45 to 1st Respondent (Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia) together with interest at 5% per annum from 13.07.2017 to date of full realisation, to be paid within 30 days of this decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment