SS PRECAST SDN. BHD. (Co. No. 971510-K) 1. SERBA DINAMIK GROUP BHD. & 9 OTHERS
The court validated the hearing by Skype because counsel for the parties consented and, alternatively, the court had discretion under the Rules of Court and constitutional access-to-justice principles to order VC; unaffirmed affidavits were permitted due to PCIDR provided counsel gave undertakings to affirm and refile after PCIDR lapses; a conditional ad interim stay of execution was justified to preserve the status quo pending merits; the interim stay order did not finally dispose of rights and was not immediately appealable.
- Citation
- BA-22C-6-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: SS PRECAST SDN. BHD.; 1st Defendant: Serba Dinamik Group Bhd; 2nd Defendant: 2nd Defendant; 3rd Defendant: 3rd Defendant; 4th Defendant: 4th Defendant; 5th Defendant: 5th Defendant; 6th Defendant: 6th Defendant
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2020
- Case Number
- BA-22C-6-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (applications to Set Aside Default Judgment; Mareva/freezing Application) / Interim Applications Heard by Video Conference; Ad Interim Stay Granted; Merits to Be Determined
- Outcome
- Ad interim stay of execution of default judgment granted conditionally; VC hearing validated; leave granted to rely on unaffirmed affidavits with counsel undertakings; merits of set-aside applications to be determined.
- Legal Topics
- Video Conferencing in Court, Default Judgment, Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order, Unaffirmed Affidavits, Counsel's Undertaking, Access to Justice, Estoppel, Appealability of Interim Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SS PRECAST SDN. BHD.
Plaintiff
Serba Dinamik Group Bhd
1st Defendant
2nd Defendant
2nd Defendant
3rd Defendant
3rd Defendant
4th Defendant
4th Defendant
5th Defendant
5th Defendant
6th Defendant
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (applications to Set Aside Default Judgment; Mareva/freezing Application) / Interim Applications Heard by Video Conference; Ad Interim Stay Granted; Merits to Be Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether hearing notices of application by Skype/VC was valid and binding on parties
- 2 Whether unaffirmed affidavits could be relied on during PCIDR and under what conditions
- 3 Whether court had power to grant an ad interim stay of execution of a default judgment pending set aside applications
Ratio Decidendi
The court validated the hearing by Skype because counsel for the parties consented and, alternatively, the court had discretion under the Rules of Court and constitutional access-to-justice principles to order VC; unaffirmed affidavits were permitted due to PCIDR provided counsel gave undertakings to affirm and refile after PCIDR lapses; a conditional ad interim stay of execution was justified to preserve the status quo pending merits; the interim stay order did not finally dispose of rights and was not immediately appealable.
Court Disposition
Ad interim stay of execution of default judgment granted conditionally; VC hearing validated; leave granted to rely on unaffirmed affidavits with counsel undertakings; merits of set-aside applications to be determined.
Orders
- All forms of execution of the default judgment stayed pending disposal of Encs.12 and 13 provided D1–D6 deposit RM500,000 by 5.00 pm on 8.5.2020 into a stakeholder interest-bearing account in the sole name of the Plaintiff's solicitors
- Encs.12 and 13 (applications to set aside default judgment) fixed for clarification/decision on 29.5.2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment