CHARTER BUILT CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD AMALAN SETAR (M) SDN BHD
The High Court held there was no breach of natural justice and no clear and unequivocal error: the adjudicator addressed and applied his mind to the principal issues (Final Account and DLP), the Final Account was prima facie conclusive under the contract, and alleged omissions were peripheral or would not alter the adjudicator's outcome; accordingly the applications to set aside and to stay were dismissed and the adjudication decision was enforceable and ordered as a judgment under s28 CIPAA.
- Citation
- WA-24C-160-10/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant in Os160; Respondent in OS175 & OS187: Charter Built Construction Sdn Bhd; Respondent in Os160; Applicant in OS175 & OS187: Amalan Setar (M) Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2024
- Case Number
- WA-24C-160-10/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement and Challenge of Adjudication Decision Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (cipaa) / Originating Summonses for Enforcement (s28), Set Aside (s15) and Stay (s16) Heard in High Court; Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- OS175 and OS187 dismissed with costs; OS160 enforcement granted and Order in Terms for prayers 1, 2 and 3 of enclosure 1 in OS160 entered
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Adjudication, Enforcement of Adjudication Decision, Natural Justice (audi Alteram Partem), Stay of Enforcement, Defects Liability Period, Extension of Time, Final Account, Excess of Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charter Built Construction Sdn Bhd
Applicant in Os160; Respondent in OS175 & OS187
Amalan Setar (M) Sdn Bhd
Respondent in Os160; Applicant in OS175 & OS187
Procedural Posture
Enforcement and Challenge of Adjudication Decision Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (cipaa) / Originating Summonses for Enforcement (s28), Set Aside (s15) and Stay (s16) Heard in High Court; Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator breached natural justice by failing to decide on the date the Final Claim ought to be issued
- 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to decide on the duration of the Defects Liability Period (DLP)
- 3 Whether the adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction by deciding on a premature claim
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held there was no breach of natural justice and no clear and unequivocal error: the adjudicator addressed and applied his mind to the principal issues (Final Account and DLP), the Final Account was prima facie conclusive under the contract, and alleged omissions were peripheral or would not alter the adjudicator's outcome; accordingly the applications to set aside and to stay were dismissed and the adjudication decision was enforceable and ordered as a judgment under s28 CIPAA.
Court Disposition
OS175 and OS187 dismissed with costs; OS160 enforcement granted and Order in Terms for prayers 1, 2 and 3 of enclosure 1 in OS160 entered
Orders
- Dismiss OS175 (application under s15 CIPAA to set aside AD) with costs
- Dismiss OS187 (application under s16 CIPAA for stay) with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment