KANYAWEE ANEKTHANABOON LEONG WEI PIN PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) CIMB Bank Berhad 2. ) Public Bank Berhad 3. ) Malayan Banking Berhad 4. ) Hong Leong Bank Berhad 5. ) United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Berhad 6. ) RHB Bank Berhad
The High Court held the correct test was the special circumstances test; given the pending variation application in the Family Court which could alter future payment mechanisms and create conflicting outcomes, the SAR did not err in exercising discretion to grant a temporary stay to preserve the status quo pending disposal of the variation application; appeal dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- BA-37G-9-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Creditor: KANYAWEE ANEKTHANABOON; Respondent / Debtor: LEONG WEI PIN; Garnishee: CIMB BANK BERHAD; Garnishee: PUBLIC BANK BERHAD; Garnishee: MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD; Garnishee: HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD; Garnishee: UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD; Garnishee: RHB BANK BERHAD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2025
- Case Number
- BA-37G-9-01/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar's Stay Order in Garnishee Proceedings / Judgment on Appeal (high Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar dated 25.09.2025 upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Interim Maintenance, Variation of Maintenance Order, Special Circumstances Test, Risk of Conflicting Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KANYAWEE ANEKTHANABOON
Appellant / Creditor
LEONG WEI PIN
Respondent / Debtor
CIMB BANK BERHAD
Garnishee
PUBLIC BANK BERHAD
Garnishee
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD
Garnishee
HONG LEONG BANK BERHAD
Garnishee
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
Garnishee
RHB BANK BERHAD
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar's Stay Order in Garnishee Proceedings / Judgment on Appeal (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the SAR properly exercised discretion in granting a stay of garnishee proceedings based on special circumstances and risk of conflicting orders
- 2 Which legal test applies: special circumstances or rare and compelling circumstances
- 3 Whether a stay would prejudice the child's welfare or render enforcement nugatory
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held the correct test was the special circumstances test; given the pending variation application in the Family Court which could alter future payment mechanisms and create conflicting outcomes, the SAR did not err in exercising discretion to grant a temporary stay to preserve the status quo pending disposal of the variation application; appeal dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar dated 25.09.2025 upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Stay of garnishee proceedings maintained until the Family Court disposes of the variation application dated 11.10.2024
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment