PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Liew Hon Kong @ Liew Kwn Voon
The High Court allowed a stay under s.97 Insolvency Act 1967 because the judgment debtor demonstrated 'sufficient reason'—a credible, meritorious appeal raising serious points of law (notably which Act applies and the validity of the creditor's petition against a guarantor) that could determine the continuation of the bankruptcy proceedings—and the registrar should have adjourned or stayed the petition pending disposal of that appeal; the creditor suffered no irremediable prejudice that would outweigh the debtor's hardship.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-4238-09/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Liew Hon Kong @ Liew Kwan Voon; Judgment Creditor: Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2020
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-4238-09/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (insolvency) / Appeal From Senior Assistant Registrar (rehearing); Stay Application Heard and Determined; Stay Granted Pending Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Receiving Order, Adjudication Order, Bankruptcy Notice, Applicability of Insolvency Act 1967 Vs Bankruptcy Act 1967, Jurisdiction, Appeal
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liew Hon Kong @ Liew Kwan Voon
Judgment Debtor
Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (insolvency) / Appeal From Senior Assistant Registrar (rehearing); Stay Application Heard and Determined; Stay Granted Pending Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a stay under s.97 Insolvency Act 1967 should be granted
- 2 Whether Insolvency Act 1967 or Bankruptcy Act 1967 applies given chronology of proceedings
- 3 Whether creditor complied with statutory preconditions (eg. s.5(3) and leave) before issuing creditor's petition against a guarantor
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court allowed a stay under s.97 Insolvency Act 1967 because the judgment debtor demonstrated 'sufficient reason'—a credible, meritorious appeal raising serious points of law (notably which Act applies and the validity of the creditor's petition against a guarantor) that could determine the continuation of the bankruptcy proceedings—and the registrar should have adjourned or stayed the petition pending disposal of that appeal; the creditor suffered no irremediable prejudice that would outweigh the debtor's hardship.
Court Disposition
Stay granted
Orders
- Stay of the bankruptcy proceedings under Enclosure 84 until the appeal to the Court of Appeal is disposed of
- Enclosure 103 fixed for further case management pending disposal of the Court of Appeal appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment