1. ) TETUAN ONG, RIC & PARTNERS 2. ) ONG KAH LOK 3. ) TUW MIN RIC 1. ) TETUAN THOMAS SHANKAR RAM & CO. ADVOCATES 2. ) YU YING YING 3. ) SHANKAR RAM POHUMALL ASNANI
The court struck out the Plaintiffs’ Writ and Statement of Claim because the impugned inter-solicitor letter was not prima facie defamatory in its ordinary and contextual meaning; alternatively the letter was protected by absolute privilege as it was ancillary to ongoing judicial and arbitral proceedings; additionally the Statement of Claim failed to particularise alleged non-ordinary meanings in breach of O.78 r.3 ROC 2012; the claim was therefore plainly unsustainable, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious and an abuse of process; accordingly the claim was dismissed with costs and the writ cancelled.
- Citation
- WA-23NCvC-84-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (law Firm): Messrs Ong, Ric & Partners; Plaintiff (individual): Ong Kah Lok; Plaintiff (individual): Tuw Min Ric; Defendant (law Firm): Messrs Thomas, Shankar Ram & Co. Advocates; Defendant (individual): Yu Ying Ying; Defendant (individual): Shankar Ram Pohumall Asnani
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2022
- Case Number
- WA-23NCvC-84-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Defamation (libel) Arising From Inter Solicitor Correspondence; Related to Concurrent Court and Arbitral Proceedings / Interlocutory Striking Out Application Under Order 18 R 19 Rules of Court 2012
- Outcome
- Defendants' striking-out application allowed; Plaintiffs' Statement of Claim struck out and writ cancelled; costs awarded to Defendants
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out, Absolute Privilege, Qualified/limited Publication, Particulars in Libel Pleadings, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Messrs Ong, Ric & Partners
Plaintiff (law Firm)
Ong Kah Lok
Plaintiff (individual)
Tuw Min Ric
Plaintiff (individual)
Messrs Thomas, Shankar Ram & Co. Advocates
Defendant (law Firm)
Yu Ying Ying
Defendant (individual)
Shankar Ram Pohumall Asnani
Defendant (individual)
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation (libel) Arising From Inter Solicitor Correspondence; Related to Concurrent Court and Arbitral Proceedings / Interlocutory Striking Out Application Under Order 18 R 19 Rules of Court 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the words in the 15.07.2021 letter were capable of bearing a defamatory meaning
- 2 Whether the Plaintiffs disclosed a reasonable cause of action or whether the claim was scandalous, frivolous or vexatious
- 3 Whether the 15.07.2021 inter-solicitor letter was protected by absolute privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The court struck out the Plaintiffs’ Writ and Statement of Claim because the impugned inter-solicitor letter was not prima facie defamatory in its ordinary and contextual meaning; alternatively the letter was protected by absolute privilege as it was ancillary to ongoing judicial and arbitral proceedings; additionally the Statement of Claim failed to particularise alleged non-ordinary meanings in breach of O.78 r.3 ROC 2012; the claim was therefore plainly unsustainable, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious and an abuse of process; accordingly the claim was dismissed with costs and the writ cancelled.
Court Disposition
Defendants' striking-out application allowed; Plaintiffs' Statement of Claim struck out and writ cancelled; costs awarded to Defendants
Orders
- Statement of Claim struck out pursuant to Order 18 r.19 Rules of Court 2012
- Writ of Summons cancelled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment