LAIN-LAIN 1. ) 1. EASA BIN MOHD NOOR 2. JAMALUDDIN BIN HASSAN 3. RUKIAH BINTI MAHMOOD 4. YAHYA BIN ABDUL RAUF … PENTADBIR-PENTADBIR 2. ) ZOLFAKAR BIN HAJI OSMAN MOHD TOWFIKE BIN OSMAN … PENSITASI
The application to cancel the citation was dismissed because the dispute is a contested probate matter that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal under Order 18 r 19; procedural defects identified did not constitute irremediable injustice warranting striking out and the proper course was to consolidate the proceedings with the existing substantive suit for full hearing.
- Citation
- 18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 134) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Administrator: Easa Bin Mohd Noor; Administrator: Jamaluddin Bin Hassan; Administrator: Rukiah Binti Mahmood; Administrator: Yahya Bin Abdul Rauf; Citor: Zolfakar Bin Haji Osman; Citor: Mohd Towfike Bin Osman
- Court
- LAMPIRAN 134
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2021
- Case Number
- 18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 134) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out / Cancel Citation
- Outcome
- Application to cancel citation (Lampiran 126 & 134) dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out, Citation for Revocation of Letters of Administration, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata / Issue Estoppel, Procedural Non Compliance, Consolidation of Actions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Easa Bin Mohd Noor
Administrator
Jamaluddin Bin Hassan
Administrator
Rukiah Binti Mahmood
Administrator
Yahya Bin Abdul Rauf
Administrator
Zolfakar Bin Haji Osman
Citor
Mohd Towfike Bin Osman
Citor
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out / Cancel Citation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the citation (Lampiran 115) should be struck out as scandalous, oppressive, an abuse of process or causing delay under Order 18 r 19; whether the citor failed to comply with the procedural requirements (including Form 167 and service/time requirements) under Order 71/72; whether the proceedings are multiplicative/duplicative of an existing suit (JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018) and thus subject to dismissal or consolidation
Ratio Decidendi
The application to cancel the citation was dismissed because the dispute is a contested probate matter that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal under Order 18 r 19; procedural defects identified did not constitute irremediable injustice warranting striking out and the proper course was to consolidate the proceedings with the existing substantive suit for full hearing.
Court Disposition
Application to cancel citation (Lampiran 126 & 134) dismissed
Orders
- Lampiran 126 and Lampiran 134 dismissed
- Writ Saman consolidated with High Court suit JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment