LAIN-LAIN 1. ) 1. EASA BIN MOHD NOOR 2. JAMALUDDIN BIN HASSAN 3. RUKIAH BINTI MAHMOOD 4. YAHYA BIN ABDUL RAUF … PENTADBIR-PENTADBIR 2. ) ZOLFAKAR BIN HAJI OSMAN MOHD TOWFIKE BIN OSMAN … PENSITASI

LAIN-LAIN 1. ) 1. EASA BIN MOHD NOOR 2. JAMALUDDIN BIN HASSAN 3. RUKIAH BINTI MAHMOOD 4. YAHYA BIN ABDUL RAUF … PENTADBIR-PENTADBIR 2. ) ZOLFAKAR BIN HAJI OSMAN MOHD TOWFIKE BIN OSMAN … PENSITASI

The application to cancel the citation was dismissed because the dispute is a contested probate matter that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal under Order 18 r 19; procedural defects identified did not constitute irremediable injustice warranting striking out and the proper course was to consolidate the proceedings with the existing substantive suit for full hearing.

Citation
18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 134) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Administrator: Easa Bin Mohd Noor; Administrator: Jamaluddin Bin Hassan; Administrator: Rukiah Binti Mahmood; Administrator: Yahya Bin Abdul Rauf; Citor: Zolfakar Bin Haji Osman; Citor: Mohd Towfike Bin Osman
Court
LAMPIRAN 134
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
6 July 2021
Case Number
18/1957 (LAMPIRAN 134) (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out / Cancel Citation
Outcome
Application to cancel citation (Lampiran 126 & 134) dismissed
Legal Topics
Striking Out, Citation for Revocation of Letters of Administration, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata / Issue Estoppel, Procedural Non Compliance, Consolidation of Actions
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Easa Bin Mohd Noor

Administrator

Jamaluddin Bin Hassan

Administrator

Rukiah Binti Mahmood

Administrator

Yahya Bin Abdul Rauf

Administrator

Zolfakar Bin Haji Osman

Citor

Mohd Towfike Bin Osman

Citor

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out / Cancel Citation

  1. 1 Whether the citation (Lampiran 115) should be struck out as scandalous, oppressive, an abuse of process or causing delay under Order 18 r 19; whether the citor failed to comply with the procedural requirements (including Form 167 and service/time requirements) under Order 71/72; whether the proceedings are multiplicative/duplicative of an existing suit (JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018) and thus subject to dismissal or consolidation

Ratio Decidendi

The application to cancel the citation was dismissed because the dispute is a contested probate matter that raises substantial factual and legal issues unsuitable for summary disposal under Order 18 r 19; procedural defects identified did not constitute irremediable injustice warranting striking out and the proper course was to consolidate the proceedings with the existing substantive suit for full hearing.

Court Disposition

Application to cancel citation (Lampiran 126 & 134) dismissed

Orders

  • Lampiran 126 and Lampiran 134 dismissed
  • Writ Saman consolidated with High Court suit JB-22NCVC-65-10/2018