Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri (LHDN) 1. ) PERKHIDMATAN ALAM INDAH SDN. BHD 2. ) ABDUL MALIK BIN M.A KADER 3. ) HITHAYATULLAH BIN SULTAN
Defendants' pleadings and affidavits did not disclose any triable issue because statutory provisions (ss.103 and 106) oblige payment of assessed tax and permit civil recovery even while appeals are pending; limitation defence and contention that claim is premature were misconceived; therefore plaintiff's claim was plain and obvious and summary judgment was appropriate against defendants one and two with costs.
- Citation
- PB-B51NCvC-4-01/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintif: Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri (LHDN); Defendan Pertama: PERKHIDMATAN ALAM INDAH SDN. BHD.; Defendan Kedua: ABDUL MALIK BIN M.A KADER; Defendan Ketiga: HITHAYATULLAH BIN SULTAN
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2022
- Case Number
- PB-B51NCvC-4-01/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Recovery (income Tax) / Summary Judgment Application (kandungan 10 Under Order 14 KKM 2012)
- Outcome
- Kandungan 10 dibenarkan; summary judgment entered against Defendan Pertama and Defendan Kedua; default judgment previously recorded against Defendan Ketiga on 27.8.2021.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Tax Recovery, Joint and Several Liability of Director and Company (s.75 A), Effect of Appeal on Payment Obligation (ss.103, 106), Limitation Period for Government Tax Claims
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri (LHDN)
Plaintif
PERKHIDMATAN ALAM INDAH SDN. BHD.
Defendan Pertama
ABDUL MALIK BIN M.A KADER
Defendan Kedua
HITHAYATULLAH BIN SULTAN
Defendan Ketiga
Procedural Posture
Tax Recovery (income Tax) / Summary Judgment Application (kandungan 10 Under Order 14 KKM 2012)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants raised triable issues to resist summary judgment
- 2 Whether the obligation to pay assessed tax is suspended by an appeal to the Special Commissioner
- 3 Whether limitation defences apply to the Government's tax claim
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants' pleadings and affidavits did not disclose any triable issue because statutory provisions (ss.103 and 106) oblige payment of assessed tax and permit civil recovery even while appeals are pending; limitation defence and contention that claim is premature were misconceived; therefore plaintiff's claim was plain and obvious and summary judgment was appropriate against defendants one and two with costs.
Court Disposition
Kandungan 10 dibenarkan; summary judgment entered against Defendan Pertama and Defendan Kedua; default judgment previously recorded against Defendan Ketiga on 27.8.2021.
Orders
- Kandungan 10 dibenarkan.
- Summary judgment entered against Perkhidmatan Alam Indah Sdn. Bhd. (Defendan Pertama) and Abdul Malik bin M.A Kader (Defendan Kedua).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment