JACKY AND JACKY CONSTRUCTION YAP KEN NAN
Plaintiff satisfied the procedural and substantive prerequisites for summary judgment on a dishonoured cheque supported by a letter of guarantee and corroborating WhatsApp evidence; Defendant's explanations were unsubstantiated, amounted to afterthoughts and did not raise a triable issue, therefore summary judgment and the requested discovery were properly granted with costs.
- Citation
- AA-A52NCvC-66-07/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Yap Ken Nan; Respondent / Plaintiff: Karuna Murthi a/l Rajangam trading as Jacky and Jacky Construction
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2023
- Case Number
- AA-A52NCvC-66-07/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Cheque Dishonour / Commercial Recovery / Appeal From Sessions Court; Applications for Discovery and Summary Judgment Adjudicated
- Outcome
- Both applications (Enclosure 7: discovery; Enclosure 9: summary judgment) allowed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Discovery of Bank Records, Dishonoured Cheque, Directors' Guarantee, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yap Ken Nan
Appellant / Defendant
Karuna Murthi a/l Rajangam trading as Jacky and Jacky Construction
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Cheque Dishonour / Commercial Recovery / Appeal From Sessions Court; Applications for Discovery and Summary Judgment Adjudicated
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether discovery of Defendant's bank account statement should be ordered
- 2 Whether summary judgment is appropriate on a dishonoured cheque supported by a letter of guarantee and contemporaneous communications
- 3 Whether the Defendant raised a triable issue to defeat summary judgment
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff satisfied the procedural and substantive prerequisites for summary judgment on a dishonoured cheque supported by a letter of guarantee and corroborating WhatsApp evidence; Defendant's explanations were unsubstantiated, amounted to afterthoughts and did not raise a triable issue, therefore summary judgment and the requested discovery were properly granted with costs.
Court Disposition
Both applications (Enclosure 7: discovery; Enclosure 9: summary judgment) allowed
Orders
- Discovery ordered: production of Defendant's Maybank Islamic account statement no. 558024301787 for January 2022 to November 2022; costs RM2,000
- Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff against Defendant for RM700,000 on the dishonoured cheque; costs RM2,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment