TAI MAY CHEAN (NRIC No.: 531113-10-5670) 1. UNITED EASTERN RESOURCES SDN. BHD. (Company No.: 416181-T) 2. NG PIK LIAN (NRIC No.: 320718-05-5012)
The plaintiff's application for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed because she failed to establish that she acted in good faith and failed to show that the derivative action was prima facie in the best interest of UER given the existing deadlock, the advanced stage and legitimate grounds of the pending winding up petition, the timing of the application in the context of multiple related suits (including MHA proceedings) suggesting a collateral purpose, and the risk of futility if the MHA or share ownership challenges succeed.
- Citation
- WA-24NCC-340-06/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: TAI MAY CHEAN; 1st Defendant: UNITED EASTERN RESOURCES SDN. BHD.; 2nd Defendant: NG PIK LIAN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2019
- Case Number
- WA-24NCC-340-06/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Derivative Action (originating Summons Under Companies Act) / Hearing on Leave Application and Strike Out/stay Application; Judgment on Leave Granted/dismissed
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's originating summons for leave to commence a derivative action (Enclosure 1) dismissed; Enclosure 7 need not be considered.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Leave to Commence Derivative Suit, Good Faith, Best Interest of the Company, Winding Up Petition Vs Derivative Action, Constructive Trust, Stay and Strike Out, Mental Capacity of Director
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TAI MAY CHEAN
Plaintiff
UNITED EASTERN RESOURCES SDN. BHD.
1st Defendant
NG PIK LIAN
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Derivative Action (originating Summons Under Companies Act) / Hearing on Leave Application and Strike Out/stay Application; Judgment on Leave Granted/dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted for a derivative action under sections 345/347/348 CA 2016
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is acting in good faith in bringing the derivative claim
- 3 Whether granting leave is prima facie in the best interest of the company given pending winding up petition and related litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's application for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed because she failed to establish that she acted in good faith and failed to show that the derivative action was prima facie in the best interest of UER given the existing deadlock, the advanced stage and legitimate grounds of the pending winding up petition, the timing of the application in the context of multiple related suits (including MHA proceedings) suggesting a collateral purpose, and the risk of futility if the MHA or share ownership challenges succeed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's originating summons for leave to commence a derivative action (Enclosure 1) dismissed; Enclosure 7 need not be considered.
Orders
- Dismissed Plaintiff's Originating Summons (Enclosure 1)
- Costs in favour of 2nd Defendant fixed at RM 15,000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment