TAN BOON LEE
On the totality of evidence (CCTV, investigator and witness testimony and post-mortem), the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, while attempting a sudden lane change from the far right to the left into a chevron diverging amid heavy traffic, did so without ensuring it was safe, caused the collision and death, and the defence failed to raise a reasonable doubt; absence of chemist testimony did not vitiate the prosecution case as the chemist was offered and defence did not call him.
- Citation
- WA-83-7285-10/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant: Tan Boon Lee
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2025
- Case Number
- WA-83-7285-10/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Traffic (s.41(1) Road Transport Act 1987) / Conviction and Sentencing at Magistrate Court (trial Concluded; Sentence Passed; Suspension Pending Appeal)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted under s.41(1) Road Transport Act 1987. Sentence: 4 years' imprisonment from date of conviction 30.9.2025; fine RM6,000 with default 12 months' imprisonment; conviction to be recorded on driving licence; disqualified from obtaining driving licence for 5 years from 30.9.2025. Execution of sentence...
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving Causing Death, Section 41(1) Road Transport Act 1987, Contributory Negligence, Adverse Inference S114(g) Evidence Act 1950, Suspension of Sentence S311 Criminal Procedure Code
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Tan Boon Lee
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Traffic (s.41(1) Road Transport Act 1987) / Conviction and Sentencing at Magistrate Court (trial Concluded; Sentence Passed; Suspension Pending Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused drove in a manner dangerous to the public under s.41(1) RTA 1987
- 2 Whether the accused's lane change caused the death of the motorcyclist
- 3 Whether the defence raised a reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
On the totality of evidence (CCTV, investigator and witness testimony and post-mortem), the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, while attempting a sudden lane change from the far right to the left into a chevron diverging amid heavy traffic, did so without ensuring it was safe, caused the collision and death, and the defence failed to raise a reasonable doubt; absence of chemist testimony did not vitiate the prosecution case as the chemist was offered and defence did not call him.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted under s.41(1) Road Transport Act 1987. Sentence: 4 years' imprisonment from date of conviction 30.9.2025; fine RM6,000 with default 12 months' imprisonment; conviction to be recorded on driving licence; disqualified from obtaining driving licence for 5 years from 30.9.2025. Execution of sentence...
Orders
- Convicted under s.41(1) Road Transport Act 1987
- Sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment from 30.9.2025
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment