1. TAN CHONG WEE (sebagai Wasi dan Pemegang Amanah bagi Harta Pusaka Tan Kim Hai @ Tan Chong Cheng, Si Mati) 2. TAN CHONG JEN (sebagai Wasi dan Pemegang Amanah bagi Harta Pusaka Tan Kim Hai @ Tan Chong Cheng, Si Mati) 3. BALA KRISHNAN A/L P
The court held that where a will expressly requires 'consensus' of all executors, co-executors cannot act by majority; accordingly the Plaintiffs lacked locus standi to commence the suit without unanimous executor consent and the Executors' Code of Conduct purporting to allow majority decisions is void and invalid; however the appointment of the 2nd Defendant as director was valid under Companies Act 2016 s202(3); the Originating Summons was dismissed with costs to the defendants.
- Citation
- JA-24NCC-32-2/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (executor and Trustee): TAN CHONG WEE; Plaintiff (executor and Trustee): TAN CHONG JEN; Plaintiff (executor and Trustee): BALA KRISHNAN A/L PONNIAH; Defendant (individual and Executor/trustee): TAN KIM SUANG @ CHEN TZONG SHII; Defendant: TAN HAN SENG; Defendant: CHAI SIOW CHEN; Defendant: SEOW GEK HONG; Defendant (company): CLAY INDUSTRIES SDN. BERHAD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2021
- Case Number
- JA-24NCC-32-2/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (probate/company Disputes) / Judgment on Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Originating Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Executor Locus Standi, Consensus Requirement Among Trustees, Validity of Trustees' Code of Conduct, Appointment of Company Directors, Requisition Meetings, Orders Against Company Officers
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TAN CHONG WEE
Plaintiff (executor and Trustee)
TAN CHONG JEN
Plaintiff (executor and Trustee)
BALA KRISHNAN A/L PONNIAH
Plaintiff (executor and Trustee)
TAN KIM SUANG @ CHEN TZONG SHII
Defendant (individual and Executor/trustee)
TAN HAN SENG
Defendant
CHAI SIOW CHEN
Defendant
SEOW GEK HONG
Defendant
CLAY INDUSTRIES SDN. BERHAD
Defendant (company)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (probate/company Disputes) / Judgment on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether executors may act by majority where the will requires 'consensus'
- 2 Whether the Executors' Code of Conduct permitting majority decisions is valid against the will
- 3 Whether Plaintiffs without unanimous executor consent have locus standi to sue
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that where a will expressly requires 'consensus' of all executors, co-executors cannot act by majority; accordingly the Plaintiffs lacked locus standi to commence the suit without unanimous executor consent and the Executors' Code of Conduct purporting to allow majority decisions is void and invalid; however the appointment of the 2nd Defendant as director was valid under Companies Act 2016 s202(3); the Originating Summons was dismissed with costs to the defendants.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons dismissed
Orders
- Originating Summons dismissed
- Executors' Code of Conduct declared void and invalid insofar as it purports to override the Last Will and Testament
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment