TAN POH YEE 1. ) TAN BOON THIEN 2. ) TAN KIM CHOO @ TAN KIM CHOON 3. ) PENDAFTAR HAKMILIK NEGERI SELANGOR
Court found bona fide serious issues requiring trial on the validity of the Deeds of Assignment and alleged fraudulent transfers, concluded damages may be inadequate and the balance of convenience favoured preserving the status quo; accordingly interim injunctions (prayers 1-3) were granted against the First Defendant pending full trial and costs were ordered in the cause.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-294-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tan Poh Yee; First Defendant: Tan Boon Thien; Second Defendant: Harta Pusaka Tan Kim Choo @ Tan Kim Choon (acting through Administrator Pendente Lite Lim Tian Huat); Third Defendant: Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-294-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Interim Injunction Application in Suit Concerning Property/assignment / Interlocutory Interim Injunction Granted Pending Full Trial
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted against First Defendant (partial relief); costs in the cause
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunction, Fraudulent Transfer, Deed of Assignment, Developer Consent Under HDA 1966 S.22 D, Caveat, Specific Performance, Mental Capacity Inquiry (mental Health Act)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Poh Yee
Plaintiff
Tan Boon Thien
First Defendant
Harta Pusaka Tan Kim Choo @ Tan Kim Choon (acting through Administrator Pendente Lite Lim Tian Huat)
Second Defendant
Pendaftar Hakmilik Negeri Selangor
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Interim Injunction Application in Suit Concerning Property/assignment / Interlocutory Interim Injunction Granted Pending Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are serious issues to be tried regarding validity of two Deeds of Assignment and alleged fraudulent transfers
- 2 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy
- 3 Where the balance of convenience lies between preserving status quo and potential injustice to defendant
Ratio Decidendi
Court found bona fide serious issues requiring trial on the validity of the Deeds of Assignment and alleged fraudulent transfers, concluded damages may be inadequate and the balance of convenience favoured preserving the status quo; accordingly interim injunctions (prayers 1-3) were granted against the First Defendant pending full trial and costs were ordered in the cause.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted against First Defendant (partial relief); costs in the cause
Orders
- Interim injunction restraining the First Defendant from any dealings or disposal in any manner whatsoever of the properties listed in Schedule A pending disposal of the substantive proceedings
- Interim injunction restraining the First Defendant from effecting collection of any rental from KO Dynamic Auto Sdn Bhd (the Tenant) or any other tenant and restraining the First Defendant from evicting or interfering with the Tenant's rights under the Tenancy Agreement dated 25.10.2017 pending disposal of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment