TEC D (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD REFINENETWORKS SDN BHD
Plaintiffs satisfied Order 14 preconditions and proved a prima facie claim for the price of goods; defendant failed to show any bona fide triable issue preventing summary disposal because goods were accepted, invoices issued, and defendant made part-payments (including after demand) amounting to admission of debt;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- BA-12ANCvC-123-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant: TEC D (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.; Appellant: TEC D ADVANCED SOLUTIONS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.; Respondent: REFINENETWORKS SDN. BHD.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2022
- Case Number
- BA-12ANCvC-123-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (re Hearing Under Order 55 Rule 2 ROC 2012) / Appeal From Learned Sessions Court Dismissal of Order 14 Application; Rehearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Order 14 application successful in favour of plaintiffs; learned Sessions Judge's dismissal set aside
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Order 14 ROC 2012, Counterclaim, Admission of Debt, Breach of Warranty, Set Off
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TEC D (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
Appellant
TEC D ADVANCED SOLUTIONS (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
Appellant
REFINENETWORKS SDN. BHD.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (re Hearing Under Order 55 Rule 2 ROC 2012) / Appeal From Learned Sessions Court Dismissal of Order 14 Application; Rehearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 should be granted
- 2 Whether defendant raised triable issues to defeat summary judgment
- 3 Whether part-payments and continued possession amount to admission of debt
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs satisfied Order 14 preconditions and proved a prima facie claim for the price of goods; defendant failed to show any bona fide triable issue preventing summary disposal because goods were accepted, invoices issued, and defendant made part-payments (including after demand) amounting to admission of debt; the defendant's disputes relate to breach of warranty and advisory liability which constitute a separate counterclaim and do not defeat summary judgment on the invoices; accordingly the appeal is allowed and summary judgment is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Order 14 application successful in favour of plaintiffs; learned Sessions Judge's dismissal set aside
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Order of the Learned Sessions Judge dated 16.07.2021 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment