MUHAMMAD SYAHMI BIN MUHAMAD SABRI 1. ) PENGARAH KASTAM NEGERI PULAU PINANG Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Dan Sumber Manusia, Cawangan Kewangan Pulau Pinang 2. ) KETUA PENGARAH Ibu Pejabat Kastam Diraja Malaysia, Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Da
The application was filed well beyond the statutory time limit and the applicant failed to provide any reasons to justify an extension of time; consequently the court had no jurisdiction to grant leave and the application for judicial review was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- PA-25-47-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Pemohon: MUHAMMAD SYAHMI BIN MUHAMAD SABRI; Responden 1: PENGARAH KASTAM NEGERI PULAU PINANG, Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Dan Sumber Manusia, Cawangan Kewangan Pulau Pinang; Responden 2: KETUA PENGARAH, Ibu Pejabat Kastam Diraja Malaysia, Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Dan Sumber Manusia, Cawangan Perkhidmatan Dan Latihan, Putrajaya; Responden 3: SETIAUSAHA, Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia, Bahagian Perkhidmatan, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, Putrajaya; Responden 4: KERJAAN MALAYSIA
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2021
- Case Number
- PA-25-47-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Permohonan Untuk Semakan Kehakiman / Permohonan Lanjutan Masa Untuk Memfailkan Permohonan Semakan Kehakiman; Bantahan Awal Atas Asas Had Masa Diputuskan
- Outcome
- Lampiran 1 (permohonan untuk kebenaran memfailkan semakan kehakiman) ditolak
- Legal Topics
- Time Bar, Leave to Apply for Judicial Review, Validity of Resignation, Procedural Compliance, Mental Capacity
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MUHAMMAD SYAHMI BIN MUHAMAD SABRI
Pemohon
PENGARAH KASTAM NEGERI PULAU PINANG, Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Dan Sumber Manusia, Cawangan Kewangan Pulau Pinang
Responden 1
KETUA PENGARAH, Ibu Pejabat Kastam Diraja Malaysia, Bahagian Khidmat Pengurusan Dan Sumber Manusia, Cawangan Perkhidmatan Dan Latihan, Putrajaya
Responden 2
SETIAUSAHA, Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia, Bahagian Perkhidmatan, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, Putrajaya
Responden 3
KERJAAN MALAYSIA
Responden 4
Procedural Posture
Permohonan Untuk Semakan Kehakiman / Permohonan Lanjutan Masa Untuk Memfailkan Permohonan Semakan Kehakiman; Bantahan Awal Atas Asas Had Masa Diputuskan
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judicial review application was filed within the time limit under Order 53 r 3(6) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012
- 2 Whether the applicant provided sufficient reasons to justify an extension of time
- 3 Whether the applicant's resignation was invalid due to alleged lack of mental capacity and non-compliance with service circulars
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed well beyond the statutory time limit and the applicant failed to provide any reasons to justify an extension of time; consequently the court had no jurisdiction to grant leave and the application for judicial review was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Lampiran 1 (permohonan untuk kebenaran memfailkan semakan kehakiman) ditolak
Orders
- Lampiran 1 ditolak dengan kos
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment