THE SPEAKER OF DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI SARAWAK DATUK AMAR MOHAMAD ASFIA AWANG NASSAR 1. TING TIONG CHOON (KP: 651031-13-5119) 2. DATO SERI WONG SOON KOH 3. DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI SARAWAK 4. SURUHANJAYA PILIHAN RAYA MALAYSIA
On the proper construction of Articles 17(1)(g) and 19(1) of the Sarawak Constitution read with the Federal Constitution, disqualification incurred pre‑election is for the Election Court and not the Dewan to determine; the Dewan therefore had no jurisdiction to disqualify the respondent for a pre‑election disqualification and the Ministerial Motion of 12.5.2017 was without jurisdiction and unlawful; appeals dismissed and Court of Appeal majority judgment upheld.
- Citation
- 01(f)-20-08/2019(Q) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant (speaker of Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak): Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar; Respondent: Ting Tiong Choon; Appellant/respondent: Dato Seri Wong Soon Koh; Appellant/respondent: Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak; Respondent: Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia
- Court
- f
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2020
- Case Number
- 01(f)-20-08/2019(Q) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Determination (federal Court)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; majority judgment and orders of the Court of Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Elected Members, Pre Election Vs Post Election Disqualification, Constitutional Interpretation, Justiciability, Dual/foreign Citizenship
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar
Appellant (speaker of Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak)
Ting Tiong Choon
Respondent
Dato Seri Wong Soon Koh
Appellant/respondent
Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak
Appellant/respondent
Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya Malaysia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Determination (federal Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak has jurisdiction under Article 19(1) to disqualify a member for a disqualification incurred pre-election (Article 17(1)(g))
- 2 Whether the Dewan's proceedings on disqualification are justiciable in light of Article 72(1) Federal Constitution
- 3 Whether pre-election disqualification is exclusively for the Election Court under Article 118 Federal Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of Articles 17(1)(g) and 19(1) of the Sarawak Constitution read with the Federal Constitution, disqualification incurred pre‑election is for the Election Court and not the Dewan to determine; the Dewan therefore had no jurisdiction to disqualify the respondent for a pre‑election disqualification and the Ministerial Motion of 12.5.2017 was without jurisdiction and unlawful; appeals dismissed and Court of Appeal majority judgment upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; majority judgment and orders of the Court of Appeal upheld
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment