RAINBOW OPTION SDN BHD 1. ) YUK TUNG PROPERTIES SDN BHD 2. ) YUK TUNG BUILDERS SDN BHD 3. ) GEOPANCAR SDN BHD 4. ) R&C CERGAS TEGUH SDN BHD 5. ) SURIAMAS LUMAYAN SDN BHD 6. ) NESTCON BUILDERS SDN BHD

RAINBOW OPTION SDN BHD 1. ) YUK TUNG PROPERTIES SDN BHD 2. ) YUK TUNG BUILDERS SDN BHD 3. ) GEOPANCAR SDN BHD 4. ) R&C CERGAS TEGUH SDN BHD 5. ) SURIAMAS LUMAYAN SDN BHD 6. ) NESTCON BUILDERS SDN BHD

No adjudicative reasoning or judicial determination is present in the text; the content is administrative—limited to repeated eFILING serial number notices—and therefore there is no substantive ratio decidendi to extract.

Citation
WA-23NCvC-48-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Applicant: Unknown Applicant; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
8 January 2026
Case Number
WA-23NCvC-48-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil (uncategorized) / Filing/administrative
Outcome
Administrative entry only; no judicial decision recorded
Legal Topics
E Filing, Serial Number Verification
Source Language
Malay/English
Court Administration Document Authentication E Filing Serial Number Verification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unknown Applicant

Applicant

Unknown Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil (uncategorized) / Filing/administrative

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the document's serial number and eFILING notice constitute evidence of authenticity or any substantive judicial determination

Ratio Decidendi

No adjudicative reasoning or judicial determination is present in the text; the content is administrative—limited to repeated eFILING serial number notices—and therefore there is no substantive ratio decidendi to extract.

Court Disposition

Administrative entry only; no judicial decision recorded