Uzma Engineering Sdn Bhd 1. ) Khan Co. Ltd 2. ) Kong Offshore Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
The court found that the Letters of Award contain valid, binding and capable-of-performance arbitration agreements (including LA 24.8.2016 and the four LOAs with the 2nd defendant), that any alleged ambiguity as to the Singapore administering centre could be resolved (SIAC was the apparent institution and had registered the arbitration), and therefore under section 10 Arbitration Act 2005 the court must stay the court proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration; ancillary factual disputes (including existence of the Collaboration Agreement and inter-company relationships) are matters for the arbitrator or trial and not for the interlocutory stage.
- Citation
- WA-22C-24-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: UZMA ENGINEERING SDN BHD; 1st Defendant: KHAN CO. LTD; 2nd Defendant: KONG OFFSHORE MALAYSIA SDN BHD (In Liquidator)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 August 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22C-24-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (interlocutory Applications Under Arbitration Act 2005) / Application for Stay of Proceedings and Anti Suit Injunction (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Applications for stay granted; proceedings stayed and referred to arbitration; plaintiff's injunction application dismissed as academic.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings Under Section 10 Arbitration Act 2005, Validity and Scope of Arbitration Agreements, Competence Competence (tribunal Jurisdiction), Anti Suit Injunction, Ambiguity of Arbitration Clause, Consolidation/multiplicity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UZMA ENGINEERING SDN BHD
Plaintiff
KHAN CO. LTD
1st Defendant
KONG OFFSHORE MALAYSIA SDN BHD (In Liquidator)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (interlocutory Applications Under Arbitration Act 2005) / Application for Stay of Proceedings and Anti Suit Injunction (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether valid arbitration agreements exist between the parties
- 2 Whether the court must stay the court proceedings under section 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005
- 3 Whether the arbitration clauses are ambiguous as to seat and administering institution
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Letters of Award contain valid, binding and capable-of-performance arbitration agreements (including LA 24.8.2016 and the four LOAs with the 2nd defendant), that any alleged ambiguity as to the Singapore administering centre could be resolved (SIAC was the apparent institution and had registered the arbitration), and therefore under section 10 Arbitration Act 2005 the court must stay the court proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration; ancillary factual disputes (including existence of the Collaboration Agreement and inter-company relationships) are matters for the arbitrator or trial and not for the interlocutory stage.
Court Disposition
Applications for stay granted; proceedings stayed and referred to arbitration; plaintiff's injunction application dismissed as academic.
Orders
- Enclosure 53 (Plaintiff's anti-suit injunction) dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment