HOYA HOLDING SDN. BHD. V. CHIA THIN HING & ANOR.
The phrase "with the connection of water and electricity supply to the said building" requires that water and electricity supplies be actually running through the internal water pipes and electrical wiring (i.e. meters installed/energized) before vacant possession can be said to have been delivered; since supplies were only effected on 24 February 1993 there was delay and the respondents were entitled to liquidated damages; appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- HOYA HOLDING SDN. BHD. V. CHIA THIN HING & ANOR.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Hoya Holding Sdn. Bhd.; Respondents/plaintiffs: Chia Thin Hing & Anor.
- Court
- Malaysian court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vacant Possession, Connection of Utilities, Liquidated Damages, Contract Interpretation
- Source Language
- en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hoya Holding Sdn. Bhd.
Appellant/defendant
Chia Thin Hing & Anor.
Respondents/plaintiffs
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vacant possession requires water and electricity meters to be installed and energized within the dwelling house
- 2 Whether clause requiring "connection of water and electricity supply" is satisfied by mere availability of supply to the housing scheme or by internal connection and energization
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase "with the connection of water and electricity supply to the said building" requires that water and electricity supplies be actually running through the internal water pipes and electrical wiring (i.e. meters installed/energized) before vacant possession can be said to have been delivered; since supplies were only effected on 24 February 1993 there was delay and the respondents were entitled to liquidated damages; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs to respondents.
- Appellant ordered to pay RM1,431.51 to respondents with interest at 8% per annum from 26 May 1993 until satisfaction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment