WONG WENG FOO & CO LONDON BISCUITS BERHAD (IN LIQUIDATION) PENCELAH 1. ) ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD 3. ) HSBC BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD PIHAK TERKILAN 1. ) Lim San Peen 2. ) GABRIEL TEO CHUN 3. ) VI
Enclosure 48 was incompetent and dismissed because Victor, as one of two court-appointed joint liquidators, lacked locus standi to act unilaterally; joint liquidators must act together; residuary powers post-winding up belong to the board and are not to be extended to enable a single co-liquidator to bypass the co-liquidator or proper procedural channels; consequently the stay prayed was refused.
- Citation
- W-02(A)-1992-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: WONG WENG FOO & CO; Respondent (in Liquidation): LONDON BISCUITS BERHAD (IN LIQUIDATION); Aggrieved Party (former Liquidator): LIM SAN PEEN; Joint Liquidator: GABRIEL TEO CHUN; Joint Liquidator: VICTOR SAW SENG KEE
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2024
- Case Number
- W-02(A)-1992-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Concerning Post Winding Up Matters (companies Act) / Court of Appeal Decision on Notice of Motion (enclosure 48) Judgment on Competency and Stay Application
- Outcome
- Enclosure 48 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Liquidators, Residuary Powers, Locus Standi, Stay of Execution, Appeal to Federal Court, Removal of Liquidator
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG WENG FOO & CO
Appellant
LONDON BISCUITS BERHAD (IN LIQUIDATION)
Respondent (in Liquidation)
LIM SAN PEEN
Aggrieved Party (former Liquidator)
GABRIEL TEO CHUN
Joint Liquidator
VICTOR SAW SENG KEE
Joint Liquidator
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Concerning Post Winding Up Matters (companies Act) / Court of Appeal Decision on Notice of Motion (enclosure 48) Judgment on Competency and Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Victor had locus standi and competency to file Enclosure 48 unilaterally as a co-liquidator
- 2 Whether residuary powers post-winding up can be extended from the board of directors to a liquidator allowing unilateral action
- 3 Whether a stay of the Court of Appeal order should be granted in the terms sought by Victor
Ratio Decidendi
Enclosure 48 was incompetent and dismissed because Victor, as one of two court-appointed joint liquidators, lacked locus standi to act unilaterally; joint liquidators must act together; residuary powers post-winding up belong to the board and are not to be extended to enable a single co-liquidator to bypass the co-liquidator or proper procedural channels; consequently the stay prayed was refused.
Court Disposition
Enclosure 48 dismissed
Orders
- Enclosure 48 dismissed with costs RM15,000.00
- Costs of RM15,000.00 to be borne personally by Victor Saw Seng Kee and payable to the Appellant subject to allocator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment