Kenneth St James & Jonathan Gerard for the Applicant [Messrs Ken St James] Dato Wong Rhen Yen and Gary Ng Cheng Yuen for the Respondent Liquidator [Messrs Dennis Nik & Wong] LAIN-LAIN 1. ) Chong Pow Yew for the Contributory, Tan Kian Soon [
Applicant failed to show cause for removal: evidence did not establish bias, conflict or personal unfitness; liquidator acted bona fide, reasonably and with proper regard to intervening litigation and valuation evidence which justified the licensing and royalty arrangements and delay in auction; removal would not benefit creditors.
- Citation
- POST WINDING UP NO. WA-28PW-717-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant: Yeo Chai Seng; Liquidator (respondent): Wong Chin Yong; Company (in Liquidation): CHD Global IP Sdn Bhd (in liquidation); Contributory: Tan Kiang Soon; Co Inventor/45% Shareholder: Choong Hwa Doong; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2021
- Case Number
- POST WINDING UP NO. WA-28PW-717-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Post Winding Up Application Under Companies Act 2016 / Application to Remove Court Appointed Liquidator (section 482(b) and 501)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Liquidator, Winding Up, Patent Valuation and Sale, Proofs of Debt, Royalty Disputes, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeo Chai Seng
Applicant
Wong Chin Yong
Liquidator (respondent)
CHD Global IP Sdn Bhd (in liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
Tan Kiang Soon
Contributory
Choong Hwa Doong
Co Inventor/45% Shareholder
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Post Winding Up Application Under Companies Act 2016 / Application to Remove Court Appointed Liquidator (section 482(b) and 501)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should remove the liquidator for bias or conflict of interest
- 2 Whether failure to pay judgment creditors justifies removal of the liquidator
- 3 Whether the liquidator acted unreasonably in valuing/licensing the patent and delaying its sale
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to show cause for removal: evidence did not establish bias, conflict or personal unfitness; liquidator acted bona fide, reasonably and with proper regard to intervening litigation and valuation evidence which justified the licensing and royalty arrangements and delay in auction; removal would not benefit creditors.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Enclosure 1 dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs of RM10,000 to the Liquidator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment