Cloete and Another v Moeller and Another (75 of 2012) [2012] NAHC 140 (4 June 2012)
Given the patient's severe incapacity, poor prognosis, and the agreement of all parties and medical experts, there is a real need for the appointment of a curator personae. The first applicant is suitable, but her powers must be exercised jointly with the first respondent, with Dr Roberts as final arbiter in case of disagreement. The first respondent, being married in community of property to the patient, is the appropriate curator bonis. Costs are to lie where they fall due to mutual miscommunication and the financial strain on the common estate.
- Citation
- [2012] NAHC 140
- Parties
- First Applicant: Zenobey Cloete; Second Applicant: Didi De Klerk; First Respondent: Luke Moeller; Second Respondent: Michelle Group Trust Home and Care Centre; Patient: Sybille Bianca Möller
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2012
- Case Number
- 75 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment After Hearing and Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted in terms of amended prayers; each party to pay its own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Curatorship, Appointment of Curator Personae, Appointment of Curator Bonis, Urgent Applications, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zenobey Cloete
First Applicant
Didi De Klerk
Second Applicant
Luke Moeller
First Respondent
Michelle Group Trust Home and Care Centre
Second Respondent
Sybille Bianca Möller
Patient
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment After Hearing and Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sybille Bianca Möller should be declared of unsound mind and incapable of managing her affairs
- 2 Whether a curator personae and/or curator bonis should be appointed and who should be appointed
- 3 Whether interim relief regarding custody and care should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Given the patient's severe incapacity, poor prognosis, and the agreement of all parties and medical experts, there is a real need for the appointment of a curator personae. The first applicant is suitable, but her powers must be exercised jointly with the first respondent, with Dr Roberts as final arbiter in case of disagreement. The first respondent, being married in community of property to the patient, is the appropriate curator bonis. Costs are to lie where they fall due to mutual miscommunication and the financial strain on the common estate.
Court Disposition
Application granted in terms of amended prayers; each party to pay its own costs.
Orders
- Order in terms of Prayers 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the amended Notice of Motion granted.
- Paragraph 3 of the order of 26 April 2012 incorporated by agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment