Dobberstein and Another v Du Toit (4 of 2012) [2012] NAHC 262 (15 October 2012)
The appellants failed to provide sufficient material facts to support their defences of payment and undue delay in transfer. Their allegations were either unsupported by evidence or too vague to constitute a bona fide defence. The magistrate did not err in granting summary judgment.
- Citation
- [2012] NAHC 262
- Parties
- First Appellant: Horst Dieter Dobberstein; Second Appellant: Gert Jacobus Boltman; Respondent: Edward Johannes Du Toit
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2012
- Case Number
- 4 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Bona Fide Defence, Occupational Rent, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Horst Dieter Dobberstein
First Appellant
Gert Jacobus Boltman
Second Appellant
Edward Johannes Du Toit
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants raised a bona fide defence to the claim for occupational rent to resist summary judgment
- 2 Whether the magistrate erred in granting summary judgment in the absence of detailed supporting facts for the alleged defences
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants failed to provide sufficient material facts to support their defences of payment and undue delay in transfer. Their allegations were either unsupported by evidence or too vague to constitute a bona fide defence. The magistrate did not err in granting summary judgment.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal against the order of the magistrate in granting summary judgment is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment