Eco-Nam Building and Civils CC v Okuvakuatjivi Investments CC (Practice Directive 61) (HC-MD-CI V-MOT-GEN 74 of 2017) [2018] NAHCMD 100 (20 April 2018)
Condonation was granted as the respondent provided a reasonable explanation for the delay. The applicant was not entitled to costs as it never came on record to defend the action.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] NAHCMD 100
- Parties
- Applicant: Eco-Nam Building and Civils CC; Respondent: Okuvakuatjivi Investments CC
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Case Number
- HC-MD-CI V-MOT-GEN 74 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Ruling on Condonation and Costs After Withdrawal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Costs, Withdrawal of Action
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eco-Nam Building and Civils CC
Applicant
Okuvakuatjivi Investments CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion / Ruling on Condonation and Costs After Withdrawal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation should be granted for late filing of heads of argument
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs after withdrawal of action
Ratio Decidendi
Condonation was granted as the respondent provided a reasonable explanation for the delay. The applicant was not entitled to costs as it never came on record to defend the action.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Respondent granted condonation for late filing of heads of argument
- Applicant’s application in terms of Rule 97(3) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA HIGH COURT OF NAMIBIA, MAIN DIVISION, WINDHOEK PRACTICE DIRECTIVE 61 In the matter between: HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN-2017/00074 ECO-NAM BUILDING AND CIVILS CC APPLICANT and OKUVAKUATJIVI INVESTMENTS CC RESPONDENT Neutral Citation: Eco-Nam Building and Civils CC v Okuvakuatjivi Investments CC (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN-2017/00074) [2018] NAHCMD 100 (20 April 2018) CORAM: MASUKU J Heard on: 14 March 2018 Delivered on: 20 April 2018 ______________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________ 1. The respondent is granted condonation for the late filing of its heads of argument. 2. The applicant’s application in terms of Rule 97(3) is hereby dismissed. 3. 4. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of this application. The matter is hereby removed from the roll and is regarded as finalised. _____________________________________________________________ REASONS ______________________________________________________________ [1] The matter before this honourable court is one where the plaintiff/respondent had withdrawn the action against defendant/applicant. Subsequently, an ancillary issue arose due to the respondent filing its heads of argument late, in terms of an order made on 3 October 2018. [2] The respondent tendered a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the heads of argument and the court hereby grants condonation. [3] The applicant has not made out a case for why costs should be awarded to it for the reason that the applicant never came on record to defend the action. [4] In conclusion, the application is dismissed with costs. _____________ TS Masuku Judge APPEARANCES: APPLICANT: G September of Malherbe & Associates, Windhoek RESPONDENT: M Schurz of Delport Legal Practitioners, Windhoek