Ex parte Application of Erhard Van der Merwe (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 95 of 2020) [2021] NAHCMD 232 (10 May 2021)
The ante-nuptial contract entered into and registered in Johannesburg in 1988 is valid and effective in Namibia because, at the time, Namibia was part of the Republic of South Africa and the relevant laws applied to the territory. Article 140 of the Namibian Constitution deems such acts as valid unless repealed or declared unconstitutional. Therefore, the legal consequences of the applicants' marriage are not governed by the law of any country other than Namibia as envisaged in section 17(6) of the Deeds Registries Act.
- Citation
- [2021] NAHCMD 232
- Parties
- Applicant: Erhard Van Der Merwe; Applicant: Elsabe Van Der Merwe
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2021
- Case Number
- HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 95 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Ex Parte Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- rule nisi issued in favour of applicants
- Legal Topics
- Ante Nuptial Contracts, Deeds Registration, Marital Property Regime, Application of Pre Independence Laws
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erhard Van Der Merwe
Applicant
Elsabe Van Der Merwe
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an ante-nuptial contract registered in South Africa before Namibian independence is valid and effective in Namibia
- 2 Whether the legal consequences of a marriage contracted in South Africa before Namibian independence are governed by Namibian law or foreign law under section 17(6) of the Deeds Registries Act
Ratio Decidendi
The ante-nuptial contract entered into and registered in Johannesburg in 1988 is valid and effective in Namibia because, at the time, Namibia was part of the Republic of South Africa and the relevant laws applied to the territory. Article 140 of the Namibian Constitution deems such acts as valid unless repealed or declared unconstitutional. Therefore, the legal consequences of the applicants' marriage are not governed by the law of any country other than Namibia as envisaged in section 17(6) of the Deeds Registries Act.
Court Disposition
rule nisi issued in favour of applicants
Orders
- A rule nisi is issued, returnable on 24 June 2021, calling on interested parties to show cause why an order declaring the applicants' ante-nuptial contract registered in Johannesburg in 1988 as valid and effective in Namibia should not be made final.
- Declares that the legal consequences of the applicants' marriage are not governed by the law of any country other than Namibia as envisaged in section 17(6) of the Deeds Registries Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment