Waandja v S [2020] NAHCMD 251 (24 June 2020)
The High Court found that the magistrate correctly exercised her discretion in refusing bail, properly considered the seriousness of the charges, the risk of interference, and the interests of justice, and did not misdirect herself. The appeal court was not satisfied that the magistrate's decision was wrong and therefore dismissed the appeal.
- Citation
- [2020] NAHCMD 251
- Parties
- Appellant: Fares Waandja; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Appeal, Rape, Indecent Assault, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Domestic Violence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fares Waandja
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate erred in refusing bail to the appellant
- 2 Whether the magistrate misapplied section 61 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
- 3 Whether the magistrate wrongly assessed the strength of the State's case and the risk of interference with witnesses or investigations
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the magistrate correctly exercised her discretion in refusing bail, properly considered the seriousness of the charges, the risk of interference, and the interests of justice, and did not misdirect herself. The appeal court was not satisfied that the magistrate's decision was wrong and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The matter is removed from the roll and is considered finalized.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment