Kadhila v Makili (CA 14 of 2011) [2011] NAHC 235 (4 August 2011)
The default judgment was void ab origine as it was granted by the clerk for an unliquidated claim without proper affidavit evidence, contrary to the rules. The appellant provided a reasonable explanation for the delay and demonstrated a bona fide defence. The magistrate erred in refusing condonation.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] NAHC 235
- Parties
- Appellant: Gideon Lisias Kadhila; Respondent: Ndinelago Makili
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 4 August 2011
- Case Number
- CA 14 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Rescission of Judgment, Default Judgment, Liquidated Vs Unliquidated Claims
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gideon Lisias Kadhila
Appellant
Ndinelago Makili
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the clerk of court could grant default judgment for an unliquidated claim
- 2 Whether the refusal to condone late filing of rescission application was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The default judgment was void ab origine as it was granted by the clerk for an unliquidated claim without proper affidavit evidence, contrary to the rules. The appellant provided a reasonable explanation for the delay and demonstrated a bona fide defence. The magistrate erred in refusing condonation.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The magistrate’s refusal of the condonation application is set aside.
- The condonation application is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment