S v Pfeifer (CA 192 of 2008) [2011] NAHC 327 (2 November 2011)
The court a quo erred by overemphasizing deterrence, failing to properly consider the appellant's offer to compensate, and relying on untested submissions from the Bar. There are reasonable prospects of success on appeal against sentence, and the refusal to admit the appellant to bail was wrong.
- Citation
- [2011] NAHC 327
- Parties
- Appellant: Hella Pfeifer; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2011
- Case Number
- CA 192 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Theft by Employee, Sentencing Principles, Compensation Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hella Pfeifer
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal of Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate erred in refusing bail pending appeal on the basis of no reasonable prospects of success
- 2 Whether the appellant's offer to compensate the complainant was properly considered in sentencing
- 3 Whether the court a quo misapplied the principles of deterrent sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The court a quo erred by overemphasizing deterrence, failing to properly consider the appellant's offer to compensate, and relying on untested submissions from the Bar. There are reasonable prospects of success on appeal against sentence, and the refusal to admit the appellant to bail was wrong.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; bail granted
Orders
- Appellant admitted to bail in the amount of N$5,000.00 with conditions: not to leave Okahandja district without police consent, inform police of employment and address changes, surrender passport/travel documents, not to apply for new travel documents until finalization of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment