Halenke and Others v The Minister of Agriculture, Water and Forestry and Others (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 485 of 2019) [2019] NAHCMD 555 (13 December 2019)

Halenke and Others v The Minister of Agriculture, Water and Forestry and Others (HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 485 of 2019) [2019] NAHCMD 555 (13 December 2019)

The applicants failed to satisfy the court that the matter should be heard as urgent because the requirements of rule 73(4) were not met.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] NAHCMD 555
Parties
Applicant: Helmut Halenke and Others; Respondent: The Minister of Agriculture, Water and Forestry and Others; Respondent: 10th Respondent
Court
High Court Main Division
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Case Number
HC-MD-CIV-MOT-GEN 485 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Motion / Ruling on Urgency and Costs
Outcome
struck out
Legal Topics
Urgency, Costs, Striking Out
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Urgency Costs Striking Out

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Helmut Halenke and Others

Applicant

The Minister of Agriculture, Water and Forestry and Others

Respondent

10th Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Motion / Ruling on Urgency and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the matter should be heard as urgent under rule 73(4)
  2. 2 Whether the applicants complied with rule 73(4) requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to satisfy the court that the matter should be heard as urgent because the requirements of rule 73(4) were not met.

Court Disposition

struck out

Orders

  • The matter is struck from the roll for non-compliance with rule 73(4).
  • Applicants to pay the costs of the 10th respondent, jointly and severally, including costs of one instructing and one instructed counsel.