S v Van Wyk (1) (SA 6 of 1991) [1991] NASC 6 (29 October 1991)

S v Van Wyk (1) (SA 6 of 1991) [1991] NASC 6 (29 October 1991)

The appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt to be the main aggressor who inflicted fatal injuries on the deceased, with subjective foresight of a reasonable possibility of death (dolus eventualis). The racist motivation for the crime is an aggravating factor in sentencing. The sentence of twelve years imprisonment is not so severe as to warrant interference.

Citation
[1991] NASC 6
Parties
Appellant: Hendrik Jacobus Van Wyk; Respondent: The State
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
29 October 1991
Case Number
SA 6 of 1991
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing, Dolus Eventualis, Racially Motivated Crime, Intention, Appeal, Constitutional Interpretation
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Murder Sentencing Dolus Eventualis Racially Motivated Crime Intention Appeal +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 37 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hendrik Jacobus Van Wyk

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was correctly convicted of murder
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had the requisite intention to kill (dolus eventualis)
  3. 3 Whether the sentence of twelve years imprisonment was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt to be the main aggressor who inflicted fatal injuries on the deceased, with subjective foresight of a reasonable possibility of death (dolus eventualis). The racist motivation for the crime is an aggravating factor in sentencing. The sentence of twelve years imprisonment is not so severe as to warrant interference.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence of twelve years imprisonment confirmed