Kiihn v Levey and Another (1) (401 of 1996) [1996] NAHC 59 (10 September 1996)

Kiihn v Levey and Another (1) (401 of 1996) [1996] NAHC 59 (10 September 1996)

The defendants' affidavit and annexures disclose sufficient material facts and a bona fide defence, particularly regarding the restraint of trade and exceptio non adempleti contractus; Rule 32(3)(b) is satisfied and the matter must go to trial.

Citation
[1996] NAHC 59
Parties
Plaintiff: Herman KiiHN; Defendant: Benjamin Levey; Defendant: 1 Other
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
10 September 1996
Case Number
401 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
application for summary judgment dismissed
Legal Topics
Sale of Business, Restraint of Trade, Summary Judgment, Exceptio Non Adempleti Contractus, Counterclaim
Source Language
English
Contract Law Commercial Law Sale of Business Restraint of Trade Summary Judgment Exceptio Non Adempleti Contractus Counterclaim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Herman KiiHN

Plaintiff

Benjamin Levey

Defendant

1 Other

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Summary Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants have a bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim for payment under the sale agreement
  2. 2 Whether the restraint of trade clause is valid and enforceable
  3. 3 Whether the exceptio non adempleti contractus and counterclaim for damages are properly raised as defences

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' affidavit and annexures disclose sufficient material facts and a bona fide defence, particularly regarding the restraint of trade and exceptio non adempleti contractus; Rule 32(3)(b) is satisfied and the matter must go to trial.

Court Disposition

application for summary judgment dismissed

Orders

  • Application for summary judgment is dismissed with costs.