Independent Asphalt Services Namibia CC v Namibia Construction (Pty) Ltd (128 of 2012) [2014] NAHCMD 329 (6 November 2014)
The proposed amendment does not disclose a cause of action because the plaintiff did not supply bitumen but claims payment for asphalt including bitumen, thus the amendment is excipiable and would cause irreparable prejudice to the defendant if allowed.
- Citation
- [2014] NAHCMD 329
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Independent Asphalt Services Namibia CC; Defendant: Namibia Construction (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 6 November 2014
- Case Number
- 128 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Amendment of Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Cause of Action, Excipiability, Prejudice to Defendant
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Independent Asphalt Services Namibia CC
Plaintiff
Namibia Construction (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Amendment of Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed amendment to the particulars of claim discloses a cause of action
- 2 Whether allowing the amendment would cause irreparable prejudice to the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendment does not disclose a cause of action because the plaintiff did not supply bitumen but claims payment for asphalt including bitumen, thus the amendment is excipiable and would cause irreparable prejudice to the defendant if allowed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs; such costs include the costs of one instructing counsel and two instructed counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment