S v Louw (1) (CA 87 of 1997) [1997] NAHC 9 (27 October 1997)

S v Louw (1) (CA 87 of 1997) [1997] NAHC 9 (27 October 1997)

The conviction was based on inadmissible confessional evidence and vague, imprecise testimony that did not justify the inference of guilt beyond reasonable doubt; therefore, the conviction and sentence could not stand.

Citation
[1997] NAHC 9
Parties
Appellant: Johnny Louw; Respondent: The State
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
27 October 1997
Case Number
CA 87 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside
Legal Topics
Housebreaking, Theft, Admissibility of Evidence, Confession, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Housebreaking Theft Admissibility of Evidence Confession Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johnny Louw

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant was supported by sufficient admissible evidence
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in admitting inadmissible confessional evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was based on inadmissible confessional evidence and vague, imprecise testimony that did not justify the inference of guilt beyond reasonable doubt; therefore, the conviction and sentence could not stand.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds.
  • The appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.