Hambata v Schwartz (56 of 2016) [2017] NAHCMD 223 (7 August 2017)
The plaintiff failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the late application to amend pleadings and did not apply for condonation for non-compliance with the case management order regarding expert summaries. The court found no good grounds for the amendment or for allowing late filing of the expert report/summary.
- Citation
- [2017] NAHCMD 223
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jona Hambata; 1st Defendant: Charlene Schwartz
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2017
- Case Number
- 56 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (leave to Amend Pleadings and File Expert Report/summary)
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Expert Evidence, Case Management, Condonation for Non Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jona Hambata
Plaintiff
Charlene Schwartz
1st Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (leave to Amend Pleadings and File Expert Report/summary)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend pleadings at the commencement of trial
- 2 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to file an expert report/summary out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the late application to amend pleadings and did not apply for condonation for non-compliance with the case management order regarding expert summaries. The court found no good grounds for the amendment or for allowing late filing of the expert report/summary.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Application for leave to amend pleadings is refused
- Application for leave to file expert report/summary is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment