S v Dausab (1) (Judgment : bail application) (CC 38 of 2009) [2010] NAHC 122 (15 September 2010)
Placing the onus on the applicant in bail applications does not infringe Articles 7 or 10 of the Namibian Constitution, as the right to bail is not categorically entrenched and the applicant is not prejudiced where he is informed of the grounds for opposing bail. There is no need to reverse the existing procedural and evidential law regarding bail applications in Namibia.
- Citation
- [2010] NAHC 122
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Dausab; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2010
- Case Number
- CC 38 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Constitutional Point Regarding Onus in Bail Applications
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Onus of Proof, Equality Before the Law, Personal Liberty, Fair Trial
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Dausab
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Constitutional Point Regarding Onus in Bail Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the onus in bail applications should rest on the State or the applicant under the Namibian Constitution
- 2 Whether placing the onus on the applicant in bail applications infringes Articles 7 and 10 of the Namibian Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Placing the onus on the applicant in bail applications does not infringe Articles 7 or 10 of the Namibian Constitution, as the right to bail is not categorically entrenched and the applicant is not prejudiced where he is informed of the grounds for opposing bail. There is no need to reverse the existing procedural and evidential law regarding bail applications in Namibia.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application to place the onus on the State in bail applications is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment