Ndukireepo v S (HC-MD-CRI-APP-CAL 80 of 2021) [2022] NAHCMD 607 (7 November 2022)
The applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The court was not convinced that another court would come to a different conclusion regarding the applicant's guilt.
- Citation
- [2022] NAHCMD 607
- Parties
- Applicant: Khamastar Ndukireepo; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2022
- Case Number
- HC-MD-CRI-APP-CAL 80 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Dismissal of Initial Appeal
- Outcome
- application for condonation refused; matter struck from the roll
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Leave to Appeal, Murder, Self Defence, Putative Private Defence, Prospects of Success
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khamastar Ndukireepo
Applicant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal After Dismissal of Initial Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant provided a reasonable and acceptable explanation for late filing of the application for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated prospects of success on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and did not demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The court was not convinced that another court would come to a different conclusion regarding the applicant's guilt.
Court Disposition
application for condonation refused; matter struck from the roll
Orders
- The application for condonation is refused.
- The matter is struck from the roll.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment