Maiba v S (CA 52 of 2017) [2017] NAHCMD 359 (29 December 2017)
The appellant failed to provide a reasonable or satisfactory explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal, and there were no prospects of success on appeal as the sentence imposed was appropriate given the circumstances. Condonation was therefore refused and the appeal struck from the roll.
- Citation
- [2017] NAHCMD 359
- Parties
- Appellant: Maiba Kolela Jonathan; Respondent: The State
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 29 December 2017
- Case Number
- CA 52 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Condonation of Late Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application for condonation dismissed; appeal struck from the roll
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Late Filing, Notice of Appeal, Sentencing, Rape, Minor Offender
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maiba Kolela Jonathan
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Condonation of Late Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation for the late filing of the notice of appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was shockingly inappropriate or induced a sense of shock
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide a reasonable or satisfactory explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal, and there were no prospects of success on appeal as the sentence imposed was appropriate given the circumstances. Condonation was therefore refused and the appeal struck from the roll.
Court Disposition
application for condonation dismissed; appeal struck from the roll
Orders
- The application for the late filing of the notice of appeal is refused.
- The application for condonation is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment