Namibia Beverages v Amupolo (2450 of 1997) [1999] NAHC 9 (13 August 1999)
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the agreed credit was 15 cents per bottle, not N$1.30 as claimed by the defendant. The defendant's version was improbable and unsupported by evidence or conduct. The plaintiff is entitled to the claimed amount, and the defendant's counterclaim fails.
- Citation
- [1999] NAHC 9
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Namibia Beverages; Defendant: Martin Amupolo
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1999
- Case Number
- 2450 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim allowed; defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Particularity of Pleadings, Parol Evidence Rule, Rectification of Contract, Credit Agreements, Promotional Agreements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Namibia Beverages
Plaintiff
Martin Amupolo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the agreed credit the plaintiff had to pass in favour of the defendant for promotional products sold during the promotion?
- 2 Is the defendant entitled to set-off or counterclaim based on the alleged oral agreement regarding credits?
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the agreed credit was 15 cents per bottle, not N$1.30 as claimed by the defendant. The defendant's version was improbable and unsupported by evidence or conduct. The plaintiff is entitled to the claimed amount, and the defendant's counterclaim fails.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim allowed; defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff N$7,289.55 plus interest at 20% per annum from 15 August 1996 until payment.
- Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs, excluding costs relating to drafting or attendance on pleadings filed in convention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment