Jekonia v Shimbulu (571 of 2010) [2010] NAHC 154 (13 October 2010)
Rule 31 does not provide for rescission of summary judgment; however, the court has discretion under common law to rescind such judgment if sufficient cause is shown, including a reasonable explanation for default and a bona fide defence with prospects of success. The applicant demonstrated both, and the negligence of his legal practitioners should not be imputed to him in this case.
- Citation
- [2010] NAHC 154
- Parties
- Applicant: Nekoto Jekonia; Respondent: Katrina Shimbulu
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2010 13 October 2010 18 August 2010
- Case Number
- 571 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Rescission of Summary Judgment / Judgment on Application for Rescission
- Outcome
- Application for rescission granted
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, Summary Judgment, Common Law Grounds, Legal Practitioner Negligence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nekoto Jekonia
Applicant
Katrina Shimbulu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Rescission of Summary Judgment / Judgment on Application for Rescission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a summary judgment can be rescinded under Rule 31 of the Rules of the High Court
- 2 Whether the court can rescind a summary judgment on common law grounds
- 3 Whether the applicant showed sufficient cause for rescission at common law
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 31 does not provide for rescission of summary judgment; however, the court has discretion under common law to rescind such judgment if sufficient cause is shown, including a reasonable explanation for default and a bona fide defence with prospects of success. The applicant demonstrated both, and the negligence of his legal practitioners should not be imputed to him in this case.
Court Disposition
Application for rescission granted
Orders
- The summary judgment granted on 27 April 2010 is rescinded and the applicant is granted leave to defend the respondent’s action.
- Applicant is granted leave to uplift the amount of N$200.00 paid as security.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment