Limon v Karuihe (HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH 45 of 2019) [2019] NAHCMD 197 (19 June 2019)

The application for condonation was struck from the roll due to non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Rule 32(9) and 32(10).

Citation: [2019] NAHCMD 197
Parties: Plaintiff: Paul Josef Limon; Defendant: Othene Karuihe
Court: High Court Main Division
Jurisdiction: Namibia
Judgment Date: 19 June 2019
Case Number: HC-MD-CIV-ACT-OTH 45 of 2019
Procedural Posture: Civil (other) / Interlocutory Application (condonation)
Outcome: Application for condonation struck from the roll; costs awarded to Plaintiff; matter postponed for status hearing.
Legal Topics: Condonation, Summary Judgment, Lease Agreement, Case Management Rules
Source Language: English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Paul Josef Limon

Plaintiff

Othene Karuihe

Defendant

Civil (other) / Interlocutory Application (condonation)

1 Whether the application for condonation should be granted despite non-compliance with Rule 32(9) and 32(10)

The application for condonation was struck from the roll due to non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of Rule 32(9) and 32(10).

Application for condonation struck from the roll; costs awarded to Plaintiff; matter postponed for status hearing.

The application for condonation is struck from the roll.
The Defendant is ordered to pay the costs limited in terms of the provisions of Rule 32(11).