Shilulu v S (CA 113 of 2008) [2010] NAHC 40 (18 June 2010)

Shilulu v S (CA 113 of 2008) [2010] NAHC 40 (18 June 2010)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to provide any grounds of appeal, and there was no basis to interfere with the conviction or sentence imposed by the lower court.

Citation
[2010] NAHC 40
Parties
Appellant: Phillip Shilulu; Respondent: The State
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Namibia
Judgment Date
18 June 2010
Case Number
CA 113 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Grounds of Appeal, Housebreaking, Rape, Sentence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phillip Shilulu

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the absence of grounds of appeal invalidates the appeal
  2. 2 Whether the conviction and sentence by the lower court should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to provide any grounds of appeal, and there was no basis to interfere with the conviction or sentence imposed by the lower court.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.