Lofty-eaton and Another v Ramos (1386 of 2013) [2013] NAHCMD 322 (8 November 2013)
The respondent failed to file a valid opposing affidavit and did not disclose a bona fide defence; the opposition was a dilatory tactic to frustrate the applicants' valid claim. Summary judgment was therefore granted as prayed.
- Citation
- [2013] NAHCMD 322
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Quintin Rowland Lofty-Eaton; Plaintiff: Claudia Patricia Gomes Ramos; Defendant: Grant Brandon Noble
- Court
- High Court Main Division
- Jurisdiction
- Namibia
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2013
- Case Number
- 1386 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- summary judgment granted for applicants
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Ejectment, Arrear Rent, Affidavit Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Quintin Rowland Lofty-Eaton
Plaintiff
Claudia Patricia Gomes Ramos
Plaintiff
Grant Brandon Noble
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's notice of opposition and affidavit complied with legal requirements
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted in the absence of a bona fide defence
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to file a valid opposing affidavit and did not disclose a bona fide defence; the opposition was a dilatory tactic to frustrate the applicants' valid claim. Summary judgment was therefore granted as prayed.
Court Disposition
summary judgment granted for applicants
Orders
- Respondent is ejected from Erf 3543, Walvis Bay, Republic of Namibia.
- Respondent shall pay the amount of N$45,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment